ladyrune24
09-16-2005, 03:49 PM
First, the thought occured to me that TPTB might distacting us with theory so we lose focus on what the island really might be and some of the other unanswered questions.
The question that quickly followed is if the redemption theory is true, how does it fit in with the island "guru's" (Locke) theory that the island will give you what you want if you give it something in return? What has Locke given up in exchange for the ability to walk and "commune" with the island (i.e. Know how to survive and know the others' secrets)?
We know that Charlie gave up his drugs for his guitar. That goes along with Locke's theory, not redemption.
THIS IS NOT MEANT TO START ANOTHER LOCKE DID OR DIDN'T MURDER BOONE DEBATE SO PLEASE DON'T TAKE IT THERE!!! THAT'S ALREADY BEEN HASHED AND REHASH SO MUCH THAT THE DEAD HORSE IS ONLY BLOODY MUSH NOW!!!
THIS IS A THEORITCAL DISCUSSION ON THE 2 ISLAND THEORIES.
Supposedly, Boone gave up his feelings for Shannon with the help of the "guru's meds" but did he really? Is that why he was allowed in the plane while Locke was not? I don't know how the issue would even fit in with redemption since he spent most of his time saving her. It might fit in with Boone not "giving the island something in return", I guess.
Or, since Boone was the only one able to climb up, was that Locke's unwitting "sacrifice"? I honestly don't see that because Charlie was given a conscious choice and so was Boone, both times. I know that's how Locke rationalized it in the end but...It makes me really wonder what Locke gave to the island to be the "guru" he is.
As far as Locke's redemption, what did he do that needs redeption? Nothing I have seen so far. His backstories show him as a constant victim of others he tries to help and bond with (and the island appears to perpetuate this with Boone).
What about Walt? I really don't see anyone holding him responsible for his mother's death. What is he? 10? He probably understands death but could he really be held responsible for it.
What about Aaron? Redemption for sins of a past life? Or is he the thing Claire will have to give up for whatever? Oops, I think I might have just excluded the redeption theory.
The question that quickly followed is if the redemption theory is true, how does it fit in with the island "guru's" (Locke) theory that the island will give you what you want if you give it something in return? What has Locke given up in exchange for the ability to walk and "commune" with the island (i.e. Know how to survive and know the others' secrets)?
We know that Charlie gave up his drugs for his guitar. That goes along with Locke's theory, not redemption.
THIS IS NOT MEANT TO START ANOTHER LOCKE DID OR DIDN'T MURDER BOONE DEBATE SO PLEASE DON'T TAKE IT THERE!!! THAT'S ALREADY BEEN HASHED AND REHASH SO MUCH THAT THE DEAD HORSE IS ONLY BLOODY MUSH NOW!!!
THIS IS A THEORITCAL DISCUSSION ON THE 2 ISLAND THEORIES.
Supposedly, Boone gave up his feelings for Shannon with the help of the "guru's meds" but did he really? Is that why he was allowed in the plane while Locke was not? I don't know how the issue would even fit in with redemption since he spent most of his time saving her. It might fit in with Boone not "giving the island something in return", I guess.
Or, since Boone was the only one able to climb up, was that Locke's unwitting "sacrifice"? I honestly don't see that because Charlie was given a conscious choice and so was Boone, both times. I know that's how Locke rationalized it in the end but...It makes me really wonder what Locke gave to the island to be the "guru" he is.
As far as Locke's redemption, what did he do that needs redeption? Nothing I have seen so far. His backstories show him as a constant victim of others he tries to help and bond with (and the island appears to perpetuate this with Boone).
What about Walt? I really don't see anyone holding him responsible for his mother's death. What is he? 10? He probably understands death but could he really be held responsible for it.
What about Aaron? Redemption for sins of a past life? Or is he the thing Claire will have to give up for whatever? Oops, I think I might have just excluded the redeption theory.