robinhood
04-19-2006, 02:04 PM
The May issue of Sunset Magazine has an ad (page 101) featuring Evangeline Lilly.
It's one of those vauge ads where it's hard to tell even what kind of product they're promoting.
Anyway, in the ad Evangeline is wearing a tasteful, but low cut dress.
I think the image was photoshopped - and poorly at that.
Most of the image seems OK, but if you look closely there's some very weird shadows and highlights in the V at the front of the dress. It almost looks like they were trying to make her appear bustier.
I understand that most advertising photography is digitally enhanced after it's shot, but it's weird when it's this obvious.
Has anyone else seen this ad?
EDIT:
Here's a link to the ad.
http://www.karastan.com/im/_inprint/evangeline_fullpage_agra.jpg
Somehow the photoshopping doesn't look quite as bad in their on-line version as in the print version in the magazine.
It's one of those vauge ads where it's hard to tell even what kind of product they're promoting.
Anyway, in the ad Evangeline is wearing a tasteful, but low cut dress.
I think the image was photoshopped - and poorly at that.
Most of the image seems OK, but if you look closely there's some very weird shadows and highlights in the V at the front of the dress. It almost looks like they were trying to make her appear bustier.
I understand that most advertising photography is digitally enhanced after it's shot, but it's weird when it's this obvious.
Has anyone else seen this ad?
EDIT:
Here's a link to the ad.
http://www.karastan.com/im/_inprint/evangeline_fullpage_agra.jpg
Somehow the photoshopping doesn't look quite as bad in their on-line version as in the print version in the magazine.