DharmaChick
05-31-2006, 02:50 PM
Not sure if this needs to be in spoilerfont, but I will just in case.
It is about the identity of 'turbine dude'.
This past weekend, there was an article about "Bad Twin" in the New York Times.
The article is also available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/27/books/27lost.html?_r=1&oref=slogin (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/27/books/27lost.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)
In this article, here is where it states that Gary Troup IS in fact the turbine man:
"Bad Twin" represents a hybrid between content and marketing, said Michael Benson, the senior vice president of marketing at ABC.
"We wanted the audience to believe this was real," he said of "Lost," adding that Troup can be seen being sucked into an airplane engine in the first episode. In an episode broadcast on Feb. 8, one of the show's characters was seen reading a manuscript of the book with the title, author and publisher clearly visible. In another episode shown this month, another character was seen reading the same manuscript, only to have it thrown into a fire by Jack, one of the castaways.
So, can we now consider this to be conclusive?
It is about the identity of 'turbine dude'.
This past weekend, there was an article about "Bad Twin" in the New York Times.
The article is also available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/27/books/27lost.html?_r=1&oref=slogin (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/27/books/27lost.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)
In this article, here is where it states that Gary Troup IS in fact the turbine man:
"Bad Twin" represents a hybrid between content and marketing, said Michael Benson, the senior vice president of marketing at ABC.
"We wanted the audience to believe this was real," he said of "Lost," adding that Troup can be seen being sucked into an airplane engine in the first episode. In an episode broadcast on Feb. 8, one of the show's characters was seen reading a manuscript of the book with the title, author and publisher clearly visible. In another episode shown this month, another character was seen reading the same manuscript, only to have it thrown into a fire by Jack, one of the castaways.
So, can we now consider this to be conclusive?